Difference between revisions of "Parts"

From apertus wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
A detailed inventory of all constituent parts and their corresponding identification codes.
=Scope=
 
Create a system that allows identifying each part in any AXIOM device with a unique identification code for assembly drawings/instructions, inventory keeping, spare part ordering/sales, billing of custom orders.
 
The system should be
* human friendly (readable)
* machine friendly (possibility to draw the code in a barcode/QR code)
* flexible in the sense that it can be extended in the future with new categories/parts that are not yet known
* fool proof and easy to read (not contain both O-letters and 0-zero numbers that are hard to differentiate -  same with 1,7, l, I, etc.)
* time saving to work with (codes shouldn't be too long)





Revision as of 19:58, 29 May 2018

1 Scope

Create a system that allows identifying each part in any AXIOM device with a unique identification code for assembly drawings/instructions, inventory keeping, spare part ordering/sales, billing of custom orders.

The system should be

  • human friendly (readable)
  • machine friendly (possibility to draw the code in a barcode/QR code)
  • flexible in the sense that it can be extended in the future with new categories/parts that are not yet known
  • fool proof and easy to read (not contain both O-letters and 0-zero numbers that are hard to differentiate - same with 1,7, l, I, etc.)
  • time saving to work with (codes shouldn't be too long)


1.1 AXIOM Beta

1.1.1 Notes & Thoughts

  • A good way to illustrate a part naming scheme is like this: MSP430_part_number_large.png
  • Shall we use 00, 10, 20, 30, 40 as second part numbering scheme so we can between any category add more (sub) categories: 21, 31, etc....?